Rejections from Literary Agents: #5
i read your proposal over the long weekend and have some thoughts about it. My first question to you is what is this book about in your view? Is it a [redacted] and if so, hasn't that already been done? It's not clear what your point of view is on the whole issue nor what the point of the book is. I understand that [redacted] but why should we care? Why is this a bad thing? These are not people we care about as characters so I'm not sure we should care that [redacted].
You write about the [redacted] but it's not clear whether you think this is ridiculous or not. It is interesting that [redacted] but not sure where that takes us.
In reading [redacted] I'm not sure I understand why you [redacted] is a good thing. What is the point ofthat? And what is the reason to not condemn [redacted] and the [redacted] and then [redacted] in the beginning of the story?
I guess my response to this is that i don't see the book in this. I get that you are [redacted] but unless there are reasons to care about this world and make it interesting, I don't see what the purpose of the book is. Or what your thesis is for writing the book. So perhaps I am simply not the right agent for you on this topic. Or perhaps I need a clearer and more articulate answer to what this book is meant to be.
With all best wishes,
Want to support this blog? Buy THE TUMOR, a "masterpiece of short fiction" by Susannah Breslin.